This writ petition sought expedited disposal of a suit dismissed under S. 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Court directed the suit to be decided within six months and allowed two weeks for rectifying stamp defects.
Direction to decide Suit No. T201815060402775 under S. 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17331 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ram Patti Devi Respondent :- Sharda Prasad And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Moti Lal Chauhan
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The defect, if any, pointed out by the Stamp Reporter may be rectified by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.
The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the Suit bearing No.T201815060402775, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Ram Patti Devi Vs. Sharda Prasad) may be decided expeditiously.
Without entering into the merits of the case, it is being directed that the Suit bearing No.T201815060402775, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Ram Patti Devi Vs. Sharda Prasad), be decided within a period of six months from the date of presentation of a copy of this order, which shall be duly certified by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 14.12.2020 Siddhant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit dismissed under S. 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 should be decided expeditiously.
Whether the period of two weeks for rectifying defects in the writ petition is sufficient.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Patti Devi
Sharda Prasad
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
