The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to file a fresh petition with reliefs, after correcting drafting errors.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition with appropriate relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16761 of 2020
Petitioner :- Kanpur Tempo Auto Malik Evam Chalak Jan Kalayan Samiti And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that certain mistakes have crept in while drafting the writ petition. He prays for and is granted permission to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh writ petition with appropriate relief.
In view of above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 20.11.2020 P Kesari
Kanpur Tempo Auto Malik Evam Chalak Jan Kalayan Samiti And 9 Others
State Of U P And 4 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
