Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as infructuous following an order passed by the District Magistrate on 24.08.2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14474 of 2020
Petitioner :- Anoop Agrawal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dhananjay Awasthi,Ramendra Asthana,Vijay Kumar Ojha
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, Sri Ramendra Asthana and Sri Vijay Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents.
Due to order passed by the District Magistrate on 24.08.2020 it is argued by Sri Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.9.2020 Swati
(Prakash Padia J.) (Abhinava Upadhya J.)
Anoop Agrawal
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Abhinava Upadhya
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
