Seema Devi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Court held an interlocutory order was not a fit case for writ interference. Dismissed the challenge but directed the Commissioner to decide the underlying appeal expeditiously within eight months, without expressing an opinion on merits.
What did the court decide?
Direction given to the Commissioner to decide the pending appeal expeditiously within eight months; challenge to the order dismissed.