The High Court of Uttar Pradesh dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear after the list was revised, leaving the court to proceed in the absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13254 of 2020
Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Saini Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None present on behalf of petitioner even when the list is revised.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case.
Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Intimation be sent to the concerned authority about dismissal of the petition and vacation of interim order within three days from today.
Order Date :- 3.12.2020
VS
Suresh Kumar Saini
State Of U P
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
