Jagdish v. Mohd. Sayeed
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or represent the case. Any interim order, if granted, stands vacated.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 43
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75159 of 2010
Petitioner :- Jagdish Respondent :- Mohd. Sayeed Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- Manoj Srivastava
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None present on behalf of petitioner even when the list is revised.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case.
Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Intimation be sent to the concerned authority about dismissal of the petition and vacation of interim order within three days from today.
Order Date :- 3.12.2020 VS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jagdish
- respondent
Mohd. Sayeed
Coram
Vivek Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/75159/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court