Single judge dismissed the writ petition for lack of annexed documents and wholly vague, unsubstantial allegations against the private respondent, deeming the petitioners' case unsupported.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10843 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Reena And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Quite apart from the fact that no document in support of majority of the petitioners has been annexed, the Court notes that wholly vague and unsubstantial allegations have been made against the private respondent.
The petition is consequently dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.7.2020 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed due to lack of evidence and vague allegations.
Smt. Reena
Another
State Of U P
4 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
