The High Court dismissed a writ petition abandoned by the petitioner's counsel, ruling it infructuous or lacking a surviving cause of action, and vacated any interim relief.
W.P. dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 54737 of 2005
Petitioner :- Haneef Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy Nagar Vikas And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.D. Agarwal
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 5.2.2020 Siddhant Sahu
Haneef
State Of U.P. Thru Secy Nagar Vikas
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
