A writ petition called in revise was dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner's absence and lack of interest in pursuing the matter on merits. Any interim order stood vacated.
Writ petition dismissed. Interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52980 of 2005
Petitioner :- Kaneez Fatma Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adeel Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.S.Shukla,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 11.2.2020 PS
Kaneez Fatma
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
