The writ petition was called on for a revision. Due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel, the court observed that the matter might be infructuous. The writ petition was dismissed and interim orders, if any, stood vacated.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49696 of 2005
Petitioner :- Shiv Shanker Kushwaha Respondent :- Mukhya Nagar Adhikari And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Smt. Fasiha Fatma Counsel for Respondent :- A.C. Tiwari
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 10.2.2020 PS
Shiv Shanker Kushwaha
Mukhya Nagar Adhikari
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
