U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Ram Beti
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal against an order of the National Lok Adalat was dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed by the appellant, who consented to the order as settled.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed. The record of the Tribunal was to be remitted.
What the court decided
Before National Lok Adalat, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1046 of 2004
Appellant :- U.P.State Road Transport Corporation Respondent :- Ram Beti and others Counsel for Appellant :- M.M. Sahai,Rajesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
- The authorized representative of Insurance Company identified by Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate is present and has submitted an application requesting for dismissal of appeal as withdrawn/ not pressed. The contents of application reads as under:
"1. This appeal when instituted had certain arguable issues but during pendency and the subsequent judgments of Apex Court as well as this Court, have covered those issues by deciding matters against appellant and no more arguable issue is now surviving, hence appellant finds no reason to continue with this appeal and is giving consent for dismissal of appeal as not pressed.
2. The appellant has moved this application by his/her free consent and without any coercion/ pressure of any kind.
3. The whole decretal amount as awarded if not already paid shall be paid within two months from today.
4. Amount deposited at the time of filing of appeal, if not already remitted to Court below, be remitted forthwith and may be allowed to be withdrawn by respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation
- respondent
Ram Beti and others
Coram
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAFO/1046/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court