The High Court held that the writ petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time and dismissed the Petitioner's writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 25
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4143 of 2006 Petitioner :- Shriniwas Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.C. Dwivedi,Sadhu Saran Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner, that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
It is dismissed as such.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 17.1.2020 LN Tripathi
Shriniwas Yadav
State of U.P.
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
