Court dismissed writ petition as infructuous because petitioner had already retired as of January 2012, rendering the litigation unnecessary. No substantive legal pronouncement was made. Order dated 10.1.2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 25
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 141 of 2008
Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Ram Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already retired on 31 January, 2012 and thus, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.1.2020 nd
Rajendra Kumar
State of U.P.
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
