The Single Judge held that the writ petition filed by Vishnu Dev Mishra had become infructuous and recorded the consent of the learned counsel for the respondents to this view before dismissing the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3617 of 2020
Petitioner :- Vishnu Dev Mishra Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tanisha Jahangir Monir Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashutosh Kumar Mishra,Ganesh Shanker Srivastava
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned Advocate holding brief of Ms. Tanisha Jahangir Monir, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and as such the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 as well as Sri Ganesh Shanker Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 6 have no objection to the above prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 2.12.2020 IrfanUddin
Vishnu Dev Mishra
Union Of India
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
