The writ petition for Want of Prosecution dismissed as none appeared for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed with the interim order stood vacated. No substantive ruling was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27913 of 2014
Petitioner :- Babu Ram Dinkar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. None appears for the petitioner.
Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing the State-respondents is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.2.2020 Imroz
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.)
Babu Ram Dinkar
State Of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
