Writ petition heard defaulted. No petitioner appeared despite revised list. Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1978 of 2020
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar And 2 Others Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atipriya Gautam,Devesh Mishra,Vijay Gautam(Senior Adv.)
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Chandra Prakash Yadav
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the petitioners even when the list is revised.
Sri Shashi Prakash Singh, Senior Advocate and learned A.S.G.I., assisted by Sri Chandra Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents.
Sri Shashi Prakash Singh submits that the petitioners had sought time for filing rejoinder affidavit, but the same is also not filed.
As nobody is appearing for the petitioners, it appears that they have lost interest in pursuing the petition.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 1.12.2020 Shalini
Santosh Kumar And 2 Others
Union Of India And 2 Others
Vivek Agarwal
Shalini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
