The petitioner filed a writ petition which was deemed to suffer from evident laches due to failure to file a satisfactory supplementary affidavit explaining the delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1484 of 2020
Petitioner :- Uma Shanakr Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sunil Kumar Mishra for the contesting respondents and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
Despite time having been granted on the last occasion, the supplementary affidavit filed today fails to disclose any valid or cogent reason to explain the evident laches.
The petition is consequently dismissed on that score.
Order Date :- 7.2.2020 faraz
Uma Shanakr Dubey
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
