This court held that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against an incorporated company and private entity and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1305 of 2020
Petitioner :- Kamaludadin Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
The principal relief is claimed against the fourth respondent which is an incorporated company and a private entity. This writ petition consequently under Article 226 of the Constitution would not lie. It is accordingly dismissed .
This order however shall not preclude the petitioner from initiating proceedings which may otherwise be maintainable in law.
Order Date :- 23.1.2020 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution against an incorporated company and private entity is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N/AReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamaludadin
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
