Vipin Kumar Saxena v. Union of India and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition regarding retirement benefits, the Court notes gratuity and provident fund were released, but contended that ex gratia payment was not received. The Court leaves the petition disposed, requiring the petitioner to file a representation before the third respondent to resolve the payment discrepancy.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to move representation before Respondent no.3 for decision within three months regarding non-receipt of ex gratia payment.