Petitioner claimed salary arrears. Court disposed of the petition without merits upon respondent counsel agreeing to evaluate the claim within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1190 of 2020
Petitioner :- Om Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amal Kumar Srivastava,Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohit Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos.4 and 6 and the learned Standing Counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition may be confined to the claim for payment of arrears of salary pursuant to the recommendations made by the 5th and the 6th Pay Commissions. He states that the claim of interest is forgone.
Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos.4 and 6 states that subject to verification of all facts and contentions on merits being kept open that claim shall be duly evaluated and a final decision thereof communicated with expedition and preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order alongwith a copy of the writ petition and its disclosure.
Accordingly and without going into the merits or otherwise of the claim of the petitioner, this petition shall stand disposed of in light of the statement noted above.
Order Date :- 21.1.2020 Vivek Kr.
Om Prakash
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
