The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Rohitash Kumar as infructuous upon the submission of counsel that the matter had already been resolved.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10520 of 2020
Petitioner :- Rohitash Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Veerendra Kumar Shukla,Sr. Advocate Salman Khurshid
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri V.K.Shukla,learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous and may be accordingly dismissed as such.
Learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.12.2020 Sanjeev
Rohitash Kumar And Another
State Of U.P. And 10 Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
