The Special Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent despite submitting an illness slip, given a history of similar adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1830 of 2009
Appellant :- Sunil Kumar Singh Respondent :- District Inspector Of Schools Jaunpur And Others Counsel for Appellant :- T.B. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Singh,Jai Prakash Singh,Vinod Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,Chief Justice Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
On going through the order sheets, it reveals that nobody is appearing in the matter since long. Today too none is present but illness slip is there submitted on behalf of Mr. T.B. Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the fact that earlier too on several occasions matter has been adjourned on the same ground, we are not inclined to further adjourn the matter. The appeal is dismissed for the want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 27.1.2020 VMA
(Samit Gopal, J.) (Govind Mathur, C.J.)
Sunil Kumar Singh
District Inspector Of Schools Jaunpur And Others
Govind Mathur
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
