The appeal was dismissed solely for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear or pursue the matter despite being added to the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 231 of 2016
Appellant :- Ganpat And Another Respondent :- Smt. Ram Shri Counsel for Appellant :- Vishesh Kumar
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the appellant even when the matter is taken in the revised list.
It appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 5.3.2020 S.K.S.
Ganpat And Another
Smt. Ram Shri
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
