The appeal was dismissed without reasons because no counsel appeared for either party when the case was called in the revised list, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 845 of 2019
Appellant :- Asharam (Died) And 4 Others Respondent :- Smt. Maya Devi And 7 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Anupam Laloriya,Pankaj Saksena Counsel for Respondent :- Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the appellant and none for the respondent even when the case was called in the revised list. Itt appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.1.2020 S.K.S.
Asharam (Died) And 4 Others
Smt. Maya Devi And 7 Others
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
