The appellant failed to appear when the case was called. The court dismissed the second appeal for lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 653 of 1996
Appellant :- Harihar Nath Respondent :- Bachcha Lal Rauniyar And Another Counsel for Appellant :- S.Rai,B.K. Chaturvedi,R.K. Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- Rajendra Prasad Rai,Naveen Prabhakar,Rajendra Prasad Giri,Vipul Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the appellant and none for the respondent even when the case was called in the revised list. .
It appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.1.2020 S.K.S.
Harihar Nath
Bachcha Lal Rauniyar
And Another
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
