The single judge allowed the C.M. withdrawal application on the submission that the matter was compromised between the parties, dismissing the second appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn; C.M. Withdrawal Application No.4 of 2019 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 154 of 2016
Appellant :- Rajesh @ Bobby And 4 Ors. Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Verma Counsel for Appellant :- Madan Mohan Jain,Pankaj Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
C.M. Withdrawal Application No.4 of 2019.
Sri Sateyendra Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the appellants submits that matter has been compromised between the parties and he does not wish to continue with the appeal.
Cause mentioned in the application has been satisfactorily explained.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Accordingly, C.M. Withdrawal Application No.4 of 2019 seeking withdrawal of the appeal is allowed.
Order Date :- 20.1.2020 Ashutosh
Rajesh @ Bobby And 4 Ors.
Ashok Kumar Verma
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
