The court dismissed an old Section 482 Cr.P.C. application pending since 2006 which could not be presented because of efflux of time and loss of surviving cause of action.
The application was dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10636 of 2006
Applicant :- Krishna Murti Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singhal,A.K. Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Ram Sewak
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 7.2.2020 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application pending since 2006 requiring no evidence should be dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
Krishna Murti Srivastava
State of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
