The revision was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the revisionist had already served his period of incarceration, in view of which the lower court record was remitted to the concerned court.
Lower court record remitted back to the concerned court immediately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1170 of 2018
Revisionist :- Pramod Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vinay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Sri Vinay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist has suffered his period of incarceration and the revision has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the revision is dismissed as having become infrcutous.
The lower court record be remitted back to the court concerned immediately.
Order Date :- 8.9.2020 R./
Pramod Kumar
State of U.P.
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
