Allowed

Karan Sharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Sept 2020BAIL/8736/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

-granted-bail-to-applicant-in-trial-for-murder-and-related-offences-under-IPC-302-201-after-rejecting-objections-regarding-heinous-nature-of-crime-and-parity-with-co-accused-while-imposing-standard-conditions-including-non-tampering-with-witnesses-verification-surtiid-attendance-and-confidence-in-trial-process.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail upon execution of personal bond and furnishing two sureties, subject to attendance in trial, non-tampering with witnesses, and abstinence from illegal activities.

Karan Sharma Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8736 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Karan Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 1672 of 2015, under Sections 302, 201 IPC, P.S. Indirapuram, district- Ghaziabad, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that co-accsued Balkishan, Lajjawati and Deepak Sharma have been granted bail by another Benches of this Court vide orders dated 04.10.2018, 27.07.2018 and 18.12.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No. 10827 of 2016, 24062 of 2016 and 44063 of 2018 and role of the applicant is on the similar footing, thus applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. He lastly submitted that the applicant, who is in jail since 21.11015 and has no criminal antecedents to his credit is entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial.

¶8

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.GA.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of the punishment, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.

¶10

Let the applicant, Karan Sharma be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the

¶12

trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶13

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶14

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶15

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

¶18

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶19

Order Date :- 8.9.2020 Ujjawal

Karan Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajabhaiya Vs State of U.P.

Shree Devi Vs State of U.P.

Bhuvnesh Kumar Mishra @ Bhanu Vs State of U.P.

Pramod Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shadab Vs State of U.P.

Arvind Vs State of U.P.