Manoj Kumar Jaiswal and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9404 of 2020
Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Jaiswal And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ripu Soodan Yadav
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Petitioner is an informant. He is seeking fair investigation. It is not in dispute that charge sheet has been submitted.
The writ has served purpose. If that be so, nothing survives.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.10.2020
VS
Manoj Kumar Jaiswal
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court