This court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous because a police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. had been submitted, leaving no ground for interference at that stage.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9353 of 2020
Petitioner :- Neeraj Kashyap And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Prasad Pandey,Rajesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
We are informed by Sri Deepak Mishra, the learned AGA that a police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been submitted against the petitioners on 28.6.2020.
If that be so, there is no good ground to interfere at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.11.2020 Chandra
Neeraj Kashyap And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
