Sumit v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
FIR quashing refused — Sumit v. State of U.P. and 2 Others; FIR dated 16.2.2020, Case Crime No.165 of 2020, Sections 323, 504, 354(Kha), 506 IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act, P.S. Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar; coram Pankaj Mithal and Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, JJ.; order dated 27.2.2020; writ petition dismissed as allegations disclose cognizable offence requiring investigation; not fit for quashing in discretionary jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
The allegations made in the FIR are of serious nature and disclose commission of a cognizable offence, which requires investigation. ¶7