The Hon'ble Court held that the filing of the chargesheet in the underlying criminal case rendered the petition seeking quashing of the FIR infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3178 of 2020
Petitioner :- Harvansh Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhai Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mazhar Ullah
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Abhai Saxena learned Advocate appears on behalf of the petitioners.
The petitioners herein seek for quashing of the First Information Report dated 7.1.2020 registered as Case Crime No.0004 of 2020 under Sections 420, 406, 452, 323, 506 I.P.C P.S Milak Khanam District Rampur.
Sri Mazhar Ullah learned Advocate for private respondent states that the chargesheet no.31 of 2020 dated 12.3.2020 has been submitted in Case Crime No.0004 of 2020 under 420, 406, 452, 323, 506 I.P.C P.S Milak Khanam District Rampur.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 17.6.2020 Harshita
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition seeking quashing of the First Information Report was maintainable.
Whether the filing of the chargesheet rendered the writ petition infructuous.
Harvansh Singh And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
