Liyaqat Ali v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 98 of 2020
Applicant :- Liyaqat Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pradyumn Kumar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
- Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
- It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
- Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 17.2.2020 Ashish Pd.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Liyaqat Ali
Coram
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/98/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court