Dismissed
Arvind Verma v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/48068/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous due to passage of time since filing in 2018, with no parties present to press it.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48068 of 2018
¶3
Applicant :- Arvind Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Babu Lal Ram,Gyan Prakash Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2018. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶7
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶8
Order Date :- 3.1.2020 Ashish Pd.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Arvind Verma
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/48068/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court