Dismissed
Maqsood v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/44545/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A bail application pending since 2014 was dismissed by the Court on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the efflux of time and lack of appearance from the applicant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44545 of 2014
¶3
Applicant :- Maqsood Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2014. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶7
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶8
Order Date :- 3.1.2020 Ashish Pd.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Maqsood
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/44545/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court