Allowed

Chandra Prakash @ C.P Bind v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Nov 2020BAIL/39548/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application filed on the ground of parity. Since the identically placed co-accused was enlarged on bail, the court held it was a fit case for the applicant's release, subject to various conditions and execution of a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties (after court restoration) on conditions including no tampering with evidence and sincere cooperation in trial.

Chandra Prakash @ C.P Bind Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39548 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Chandra Prakash @ C.P Bind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Nand Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶6

The co-accused, Ramesh Chandra Dubey, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 8.09.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.19489 of 2020. The prayer for release of the applicant on bail on the ground of parity has been made. The applicant is languishing in jail since 26.5.2020.

¶7

Considering the fact that the identically placed coaccused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶8

Let the applicant, Chandra Prakash @ C.P Bind, involved in case crime No.77 of 2020, under sections 41,411,413,419, 420 I.P.C, Police Station Shankargarh, District Prayagraj be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶10

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶11

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶12

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme

¶13

Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶14

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored. In case court below is functioning normally, this condition will not apply and applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of bail bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court below.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

7.The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 17.11.2020 Atul kr. sri.

Chandra Prakash @ C.P Bind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Prakash @ C.P Bind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guljar Vs State of U.P.

Vijay Karan Rajpoot Vs State of U.P.

Akib Vs State of U.P.

Manish Vs State of U.P.

Dilshad Vs State of U.P.

Shivam Vs State of U.P.