Bail application filed by Jagveer @ Jagga, an individual accused under the U.P. Gangsters Act via a statutory order under Section 380 of Statutory Emergency Orders 2020. The court considered the bail principles laid down in Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38468 of 2020
Applicant :- Jagveer @ Jagga Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls iwjd 'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k x;k] bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk;A
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd txohj mQZ tXxk dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 380 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 2/3 U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Fkkuk [kSj] ftyk vyhx<+ esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,o a fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds fo:) xSax pkVZ esa nf’kZr fd, x, oknksa esa mldh tekur gks pqdh gS Li"Vhdj.k 'kiFki= esa fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd fdlh xSax dk yhMj ;k lnL; ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 24&5&2019 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA
i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj
gksxkA
fn0 % 02&12&2020 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an individual accused under the U.P. Gangsters Act via a statutory order under Section 380 is liable to detention as he is not a registered First Information Report lori
Whether bail for the applicant can be granted based on Supreme Court principles regarding detention under statutory orders
Whether the statutory order made under Section 380 of Statutory Emergency Orders 2020 can be quashed in the present case
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶9
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 · Who else cites this
Statutory Emergency Orders 2020Referred¶6
Eq0v0la0 380 lu 2020
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jagveer @ Jagga
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
