Farhan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge rejected bail application for applicant Farhan, a history-sheeter implicatable in dacoity/extortion. Court held prior bail violations relevant to public order, finding no fit case for release.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Reserved On:- 09.09.2020 Delivered On:- 16.09.2020
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3659 of 2020
Applicant :- Farhan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deena Nath,Ashwini Kumar Tripathi,Aushim Luthra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajay Nand Pandey,Rakesh Dubey Hon'ble Siddharth, J.
- Heard Sri Manish Tiwary, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Ashwini Kumar Tripathi, Sri D.N. Joshi and Sri Prabha Shankar Mishra, learned counsels for the applicant; Sri Rakesh Dubey, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
- The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Farhan, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 1212 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 447, 386 I.P.C., Police StationDhoomanganj, District- Prayagraj, during pendency of trial.
- The allegations in the F.I.R. against the applicant are that the informant purchased land of Gata No. 92 situated in village- Gayasuddinpur Uparhar, Police Station- Dhoomanganj, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Prayagraj and on 8.11.2019 at 11 a.m., he was digging his plot for raising boundaries when the applicant along with six unknown persons came with illegal arms and demanded illegal money of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Gunda Tax) from the informant and threatened him of life. The F.I.R. was lodged on 05.12.2019.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, a history-sheeter with grave criminal antecedents and a record of violating bail conditions, is entitled to bail.
Whether violation of bail conditions in earlier cases is relevant for consideration in the present bail application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Farhan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3659/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court