Allowed

Tejpal @ Kallu Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Nov 2020BAIL/34585/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the appellant in a criminal case, setting conditions including surrender to police stations, appearance at court proceedings without legal aid, and subsequent appearance in the High Court if convicted.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the appellant subject to several conditions including surrendering to the police and appearing in court proceedings.

Tejpal @ Kallu Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34585 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Tejpal @ Kallu Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jaysingh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd rstiky mQZ dkyw ;kno dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 590 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 21@22 ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 ,sDV] Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk yfyriqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds ikl ls fn[kk;h x;h cjkenxh QthZ gS mlds ikl ls mDr cjkenxh ugha gq;h gS ,oa cjkenxh dk dksbZ p’enhn tulk{kh ugha gS] iqfyl }kjk /kkjk 50 ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 ,sDV dk vuqikyu ugha fd;k x;k gS] vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 8&8&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 37 ds lanHkZ esa tekur ds fy, vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; vnkyr dks vfHk;qDr ds nks"kh gksus vFkok mlds xqukgxkj gksus ds rF; ij fopkj ugha fd;k tkrk gSA ;g lhfer mn~ns’; ds fy, vfuok;Z :i ls vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk djus ds loky ij lhfer gS ftlesa vnkyr dks ;g ns[kuk gksrk gS fd D;k ;g ekuus ds fy, mfpr vk/kkj gSa fd vfHk;qDr nks"kh ugha gS vkSj ,sls vk/kkj ds vfLrRo ds ckjs esa vnkyr viuh larqf"V ntZ djrh gSA ysfdu vnkyr dks bl ekeys ij fopkj ugha djuk gS tSls fd og nks"keqDr gksus dk QSlyk lquk jgh gks vkSj nks"kh ugha gksus dk irk yxk jgh gksA

¶10

ekeys ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari,

¶11

(2007) 7 SCC 798 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds nf"Vxr] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 dk cM+k tukns’k] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] leFkZu esa lcwrksa dh izd`fr] ltk dh xaHkhjrk] vkjksih&vkosnd dk pfj=] ifjfLFkfr;kW] eqdnesa esa vfHk;qDr dh mifLFkfr dks lqjf{kr djus dh mfpr laHkkouk] xokgksa ls NsM+NkM+ dh mfpr vk’kadk] turk@jkT; vkSj vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk cM+k fgr] ysfdu xq.k&nks"k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk] esjk ekuuk gS fd ;g tekur nsus ds fy, ,d mi;qDr ekeyk gSA

¶12

rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶13

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶14

2& vkosnd ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

3& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

4& vkosnd O;fDrxr :i ls ;k vius vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls U;k;ky; esa fu;r izR;sd frfFk ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr jgsxkA mudh vuqifLFkfr ds ekeys esa] i;kZIr dkj.k ds fcuk] fopkj.k U;k;ky; muds f[kykQ Hkk0na0la0 dh /kkjk 229&, ds rgr dk;Zokgh dj ldrh gSA

¶17

5& vkosnd ;fn bl izdj.k esa tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx djrk gS vkSj mldh mifLFkfr lqfuf’pr djus ds fy, mlds fo:) /kkjk 82 na0iz0la0 dh dk;Zokgh tkjh dh tkrh gS vkSj vkosnd bl rjg dh mn~?kks"k.kk esa fu;r dh x;h frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksus esa foQy jgrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh /kkjk 174&, ds rgr] dkuwu ds vuqlkj] mlds f[kykQ dk;Zokgh izkjEHk djsxkA

¶18

6& vkosnd ekeys ds izkjEHk gksus dh frfFk ij] vkjksi fojfpr fd, tkus dh frfFk ij ,oa /kkjk 313 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr c;ku gksus ds Lrj ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr jgsxkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk bu 'krksZ dk csotg mYya?ku fd;k tk jgk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g vf/kdkj gksxk fd og vfHk;qDr }kjk tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ekurs gq, mlds fo:) mfpr dk;Zokgh djsA

¶19

7& vkosnd dks ;fn ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa ds rgr xfBr lfefr ds vkns’k ds vuqlkj vYidkfyd tekur ij c<+k;k x;k gS rks vYidkfyd tekur dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ckn mldh tekur izHkkoh gksxhA

¶20

8& vnkyrksa ds lkekU; dkedkt ds cgky gksus rd vkosnd dks fcuk fdlh tekur ds futh eqpyds ij tekur ij c<+k;k tk,xkA vnkyr ds lkekU; dkedkt cgky gksus ds ckn vkjksih ,d eghus ds Hkhrj vnkyr dh larqf"V ds izfrHkqvksa dks izLrqr djsxkA

¶21

9& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶22

10& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶23

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj gksxkA fn0 % 2&11&2020 ds0lh0flag

¶24

2 of 2

Tejpal @ Kallu Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tejpal @ Kallu Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Ali Vs State of U.P.

Lokendra Vs State of U.P.

Riyasat Ali Vs State of U.P.

Yaqoob Vs State of U.P.

Khalil @ Sadial Vs State of U.P.

Faizal Vs State of U.P.