Allowed

Riyasat Ali v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Oct 2020BAIL/18846/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court considered Criminal Misc. Bail Application regarding arrest under Section 42, Explosive Act. Applying Dataram Singh guidelines, the Court granted bail, exonerating the applicant of prior offenses and directing distant acquittal restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with conditions to avoid wasting court time using bail, refrain from participating in proceedings or testifying, and report to police station once bail is exonerated.

Riyasat Ali Vs State of U.P. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18846 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Riyasat Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Nanhe Lal Tripathi,Amit Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd fj;klr vyh dh vksj ls eq0 v0 la0 42 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 4/5 Explosive Act, Fkkuk lqYrkuiqj ?kksl] ftyk Qrsgiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds dCts ls nks vnn ftank ns’kh ce dh QthZ cjkenxh fn[kkrs gq, mldk pkyku fd;k x;k gS] vkosnd ds ikl ls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gq;h gS] vkosnd iwoZ ltk;kQrk ugha gS vkSj u gh mldk dksbZ iwoZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 26&5&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh

¶10

Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶11

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶12

2& vkosnd ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶13

3& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶14

4& vkosnd dks ;fn ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa ds rgr xfBr lfefr ds vkns’k ds vuqlkj vYidkfyd tekur ij c<+k;k x;k gS rks vYidkfyd tekur dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ckn mldh tekur izHkkoh gksxhA

¶15

5& vnkyrksa ds lkekU; dkedkt ds cgky gksus rd vkosnd dks fcuk fdlh tekur ds futh eqpyds ij tekur ij c<+k;k tk,xkA vnkyr ds lkekU; dkedkt cgky gksus ds ckn vkjksih ,d eghus ds Hkhrj vnkyr dh larqf"V ds izfrHkqvksa dks izLrqr djsxkA

¶16

6& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶17

7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶18

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj

¶19

gksxkA

¶20

fn0 % 22&10&2020 ds0lh0flag

¶21

2 of 2

Riyasat Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riyasat Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Gautam Vs State of U.P.

Dheeraj Singh @ Deo @ Poli @ Nepali Vs State of U.P.

Iqbal Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Ali Vs State of U.P.

Lokendra Vs State of U.P.

Kishan Vs State of U.P.