Kalu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3269 of 2020, this court allowed the application of Kalu, an accused in a case involving seduction and abduction, granting release on bail with sureties and an undertaking.
What did the court decide?
Applicant Kalu released on bail with one personal bond and two reliable sureties subject to stipulated conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3269 of 2020
Applicant :- Kalu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Adesh Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.
Accused-applicant, involved in Case Crime No.347 of 2019, under Sections 363 and 366 I.P.C., Police Station Iglas, District Aligarh, applied for bail.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has committed no offence. Entire prosecution story is false and fake. It is further submitted that as per statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. victim is aged about 17 years, she did not level any allegation against the applicant. Applicant is in jail since 20.09.2019. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Due to heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no possibility of early conclusion of the trial.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the accused applicant charged under Section 363 and 366 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kalu
Coram
Rajendra Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3269/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court