Rajpal v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 91

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32611 of 2020

Applicant :- Rajpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd jktiky dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 36 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 2/3 U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Fkkuk D;ksyfM+;k] ftyk cjsyh esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds fo:) xSax pkVZ esa nf’kZr oknksa esa mldh tekur Lohd`r gks pqdh gS] ftldk Li"Vhdj.k 'kiFki= esa fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd fdlh xSax dk yhMj ;k lnL; ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 2&3&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A