The Single Judge granted bail to the applicant under Article 22 of the Constitution, directing him to remain on bail and attend diary proceedings, following the guidelines in Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari (2007).
Granted interim bail with conditions to attend diary proceedings, ensure fair trial, and comply with judicial orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32608 of 2020
Applicant :- Pintu @ Satyadev Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd fiUVw mQZ lR;nso feJk dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 183 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20 ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 ,sDV] Fkkuk gfy;k] ftyk ehjtkiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds ikl rFkkdfFkr xkatk cjken fd;k tkuk ugha dgk x;k gS] vkosnd ekSds ij fxjQ~rkj ugha fd;k x;k] vkosnd us U;k;ky; esa Lo;a vkReleiZ.k fd;k gS] vkosnd dks lg vfHk;qDrx.k ds c;ku ds vk/kkj ij >wBk vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa lg vfHk;qDr vuwi frokjh dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 4146 lu 2020 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 28&1&2020 }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 8&6&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA
Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 37 ds lanHkZ esa tekur ds fy, vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; vnkyr dks vfHk;qDr ds nks"kh gksus vFkok mlds xqukgxkj gksus ds rF; ij fopkj ugha fd;k tkrk gSA ;g lhfer mn~ns’; ds fy, vfuok;Z :i ls vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk djus ds loky ij lhfer gS ftlesa vnkyr dks ;g ns[kuk gksrk gS fd D;k ;g ekuus ds fy, mfpr vk/kkj gSa fd vfHk;qDr nks"kh ugha gS vkSj ,sls vk/kkj ds vfLrRo ds ckjs esa vnkyr viuh larqf"V ntZ djrh gSA ysfdu vnkyr dks bl ekeys ij fopkj ugha djuk gS tSls fd og nks"keqDr gksus dk QSlyk lquk jgh gks vkSj nks"kh ugha gksus dk irk yxk jgh gksA
ekeys ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds nf"Vxr] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 dk cM+k tukns’k] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] leFkZu esa lcwrksa dh izd`fr] ltk dh xaHkhjrk] vkjksih&vkosnd dk pfj=] ifjfLFkfr;kW] eqdnesa esa vfHk;qDr dh mifLFkfr dks lqjf{kr djus dh mfpr laHkkouk] xokgksa ls NsM+NkM+ dh mfpr vk’kadk] turk@jkT; vkSj vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk cM+k fgr] ysfdu xq.k&nks"k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk] esjk ekuuk gS fd ;g tekur nsus ds fy, ,d mi;qDr ekeyk gSA
rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
5& vkosnd ;fn bl izdj.k esa tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx djrk gS vkSj mldh mifLFkfr lqfuf’pr djus ds fy, mlds fo:) /kkjk 82 na0iz0la0 dh dk;Zokgh tkjh dh tkrh gS vkSj vkosnd bl rjg dh mn~?kks"k.kk esa fu;r dh x;h frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksus esa foQy jgrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh /kkjk 174&, ds rgr] dkuwu ds vuqlkj] mlds f[kykQ dk;Zokgh izkjEHk djsxkA
6& vkosnd ekeys ds izkjEHk gksus dh frfFk ij] vkjksi fojfpr fd, tkus dh frfFk ij ,oa /kkjk 313 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr c;ku gksus ds Lrj ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr jgsxkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk bu 'krksZ dk csotg mYya?ku fd;k tk jgk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g vf/kdkj gksxk fd og vfHk;qDr }kjk tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ekurs gq, mlds fo:) mfpr dk;Zokgh djsA
10& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA
mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj
gksxkA
fn0 % 13&10&2020 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused is entitled to bail under Article 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India considering the principles laid down in Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari.
What conditions should be imposed on the accused for granting bail in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar KeshariExplained¶9
Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 · Who else cites this
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Pintu @ Satyadev Mishra
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
