It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent. The present first information report lodged by the informant/complainant, namely, Shubham Gupta, is nothing but a bundle of lie and the same has been lodged only for exploiting the applicant by indulging his name in a fake, false and frivolous case. The entire prosecution story as unfolded in the first information report is absolutely a self-made story projected by the complainant. It is further submitted that as per the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., the injured/complainant has assigned the role of causing injuries to him, to the applicant as well as four other co-accused, namely, Rishabh Nishad, Banti Nishad, Raju @ Rajesh and Golu Nishad and they all have been identified by him. The three co-accused, namely, Risabh Nishad, Bunti Nishad @ Saruabh and Golu Nishad @ Alok, who have been assigned the same role of causing injuries to the injured, have already been enlarged on bail by this Bench subsequent to the passing of the order rejecting the first bail application of the applicant, copies of their bail orders have been enclosed as Annexure-7 to the affidavit accompanying the present bail application. The case of the present applicant is similar and identical to that of the aforesaid co-accused. As such the present applicant is also liable to be enlarged on bail. Apart from the above, learned counsel for the applicant has also pressed the issue of period of detention of the applicant i.e. 21st February, 2019, who has undergone nearly one year of
