Vakeel v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the court addressed the applicant's request for release. The court found it a fit case for bail, granting release subject to specific conditions including furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Release of the applicant on bail with conditions regarding personal bond, sureties, and non-tampering with evidence.
What the court decided
Court No. - 2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29327 of 2020
Applicant :- Vakeel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Parmar,Hariom Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State respondent.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that three cases have been shown against the applicant in the gang-chart and in those cases, the applicant is on bail. Copies of bail orders have been annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. It has also been submitted that the applicant is not involved in any antisocial activities and he has been falsely implicated in the present crime. The copy of the gangchart has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the affidavit. It is further submitted that there is no chance of the applicant fleeing away from the judicial process or of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 28.7.2020 and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. However, he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the cases mentioned in the gang-chart.
Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon the perusal of the record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail under Section 2/3 of the UP Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vakeel
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vipin Chandra Dixit
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/29327/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court