Allowed

Satbeer v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Oct 2020BAIL/29321/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29321 of 2020, the Magistrate allowed bail to the applicant Satbeer in Case Crime No. 1 of 2020. The order mandated furnishing of a personal bond and two sureties while imposing specific conditions including non-tampering with evidence and abiding by court orders.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount subject to conditions.

Satbeer Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 2

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29321 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Satbeer Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shams Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State respondent.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that three cases have been shown against the applicant in the gang-chart and in those cases, the applicant is on bail. Copies of bail orders have been annexed as Annexure-3 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. It has also been submitted that the applicant is not involved in any antisocial activities and he has been falsely implicated in the present crime. The copy of the gangchart has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit. It is further submitted that there is no chance of the applicant fleeing away from the judicial process or of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 3.1.2020 and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

It is further submitted that co-accused Rajbeer and Sukhbeer have already been granted bail by the High Court in Criminal Misc. Bail application Nos. 13928 of 2020 and 9782 of 2020 which have been annexed as Annexure-5 to the affidavit.

¶8

Learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. However, he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the cases mentioned in the gang-chart.

¶9

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon the perusal of the record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶10

Let applicant- Satbeer be released on bail in Case Crime No.1 of 2020 under Section 2/3 UP Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at P.S.Singhawali Ahir, District Baghpat, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶11

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complaint in any manner whatsoever.

¶12

(ii) The applicant will abide by the orders of the court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activity.

¶14

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶16

Order Date :- 5.10.2020 P.P.

Satbeer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satbeer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anoop Kumar Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P.

Monu @ Kanahiya Vs State of U.P.

Sunil Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar Chaudhary Vs State of U.P.

Sundar Vs State of U.P.

Vakeel Vs State of U.P.