Guddu @ Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 72

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26133 of 2020

Applicant :- Guddu @ Anil Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that co-accused, Pradeep Kumar, having an identical role has already been granted bail by this Court on 8.9.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23742 of 2020, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 16.06.2020. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Guddu @ Anil Kumar , involved in Case Crime No. 253 of 2020, under Sections- 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police StationBhawanpur, District -Meerut, be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. It is further provided that this bail order available on the official website of the High Court will be taken to be the authentic one and certified copy shall be submitted before that court concerned as soon as it is issued.

¶9

This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without

¶12

seeking any adjournment.

¶13

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

¶15

In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 21.9.2020

¶20

Sartaj

Guddu @ Anil Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu @ Anil Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra Nath Mishra Vs State of U.P

Vikas Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Kumar Sonker Vs State of U.P.

Shahzad Vs State of U.P.

Riyaz Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vishal and Another Vs State of U.P.