Riyaz Vs State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 72

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23127 of 2020

Applicant :- Riyaz Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vidit Khanna Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant through vedio conferencing, Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sunil Kumar Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to village party bandi. As per FIR version, role of causing injury by knife has been assigned to co-accused Chand and general role has been assigned to other co-accused. The statement of eye witnesses have been recorded in which they have not assigned any role to the applicant. Applicant is having no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 4.4.2020 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Riyaz , involved in Case Crime No.60 of 2020, under Sections- 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307, 452, 34, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Afzalgarh, District- Bijnor be released on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. It is further provided that this bail order available on the official website of the High Court will be taken to be the authentic one and certified copy shall be submitted before that court concerned as soon as it is issued.

¶9

This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

¶14

In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 21.9.2020 Junaid

¶19

Digitally signed by Justice Neeraj Tiwari Date: 2020.09.21 17:18:02 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Riyaz v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riyaz v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra Nath Mishra Vs State of U.P

Vikas Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Kumar Sonker Vs State of U.P.

Guddu @ Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Shahzad Vs State of U.P.

Vishal and Another Vs State of U.P.