Ram Sanehi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court released the applicant on bail by his personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions prohibiting criminal activity, tampering with evidence, and pressurizing witnesses.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties on prescribed conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16285 of 2019
Applicant :- Ram Sanehi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Daya Ram Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Daya Ram Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the present bail application.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant Ram Sanehi with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 0277 of 2018, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Etah.
As per prosecution version, an F.I.R. was lodged by complainant Jagannath against four named persons making allegations that they have taken his immovable property by getting a sale deed executed through imposter. Subsequently, during investigation, the name of the present accused-applicant has come into light, who has assigned the role of being imposter of the sale deed.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is not named in the first information report. He never executed the said sale deed in favour of the other accused persons. He is a sick old man aged about 60 years. He was said by Dharmendra that he would prepare the old age pension papers and for that purpose, he signed the papers and the other accused persons by making conspiracy got the sale deed executed. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is an illiterate persons and was unable to understand te implications and complications of the said
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in a non-cognizable case involving forgery and cheating.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Sanehi
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/16285/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court